Tuesday, November 20, 2018

All the unseen




A viper once struck the inner curve of my bare foot.  Which foot? I no longer remember. It left two dots where it punctured my skin, two red dots like the one I used to paint on my forehead every day, long ago, when I lived in India, when I was a child. 

One of the four most poisonous snakes in India bit me. I never saw it. I didn’t even hear it hiss, although the pain shooting through me tore an animal scream out of my throat. Tears spurted into my eyes. I wiped them away. I had never cried before my siblings and would not start now. In the insight of that instant I understood the cliché of pain like hot swords; my brain, losing its sense of reality, had searched to see a little man holding white-hot metal knives, ready to pierce my skin again. How could I have missed 

such a sound, my brother asked, for it was dark and the road to the doctor’s home was long and potholed and he did not want to drive. My mother could not drive and eager not to disturb her first son’s evening, she, too, insisted it could not have been a snake. 

Their certainty overwhelmed me. Perhaps by then I was tired of fighting. I had won many fights, left the country already, though in my late teens, ready to live alone in a country far away across the ocean. I had won enough and was too tired to battle again. For one thing, the pain was excruciating. Worse than labor, I can say now, although I knew nothing of child bearing then: I was busy baring my soul

baring my detest of unquestioning obedience, my refusal to stay quiet in the face of injustices reaped by my elders though not my betters, societal wrongs I had to fight, I mean. My teen years were too full of larger issues for me to stay self-obsessed. It was an age when girls were shunned for days when they had a period – a custom many South Asian Indian American friends observe even today, even all these miles away from the oppression into which they were born….



Most snakes weren’t poisonous anyhow; and I had been foolish, my footsteps muffled by sand, as I shuffled through beach grasses ruffled by the starlit breeze in the wildest acre of my sister-in-law’s rambling garden. So I let it go, without argument. 

My silence made it harder to protest later. I almost fainted, I could have said. Take me to a doctor, I could have said. If I had fussed enough, perhaps they would have grumbled their way to a clinic, with me in tow. I stayed quiet, although it took an effort not to sob with pain; I who had not shrieked, not once when my father took the horsewhip off the wall and sent it snaking, repeatedly, onto my six-year old skin. 

Why? I had not protested my innocence as a child, because I was too busy biting my lip, thinking I shall not give him the pleasure of hearing me scream, I shall never weep before this man. It was the same stubbornness when my mother and siblings said it was not a snake. My mother hated to be a burden to others. My siblings, nineteen, seventeen and fifteen years older than I found me a burden,

You crave attention they’d say in a few days when I’d passed blood for the second time and finally said I had to get to the hospital. This is just something you brought on yourself because you’re such an angry disrespectful girl. To this day, they insist I am not independent. They must know. They live near the place of their birth, still, the place I left when I was not-quite-nineteen,

To make my way alone. I loved alone-ness. Loneliness caught at my throat every now and then as a child, but alone-ness was another universe. A universe I escaped into each time I walked alone or stood alone. A universe waiting in the dazzle of dewdrops dancing on waxy lotus leaves that rose above the squishy mud of the pond in that same garden where I was snake-bitten. Sunlit dewdrops, diamond bright before they disappeared 

out of ephemeral lives. Perhaps my love of alone-ness was why I wasn’t scared when the doctor held my hands in his and said, "You are so cheerful, you give me hope." “Aren’t you the one who should be giving me the hope?” I said and laughed. Yes, I laughed right through the pain, though pain I was and still am scared of. The indignity pain can bring. I never want to suffer such a thing. So I joked as much as I could

Intravenous dinner for me tonight, I guess? Some doctors forced their lips into smiles. Plural, yes. There were at least three around my bed and then many visited through the night. It was like being in a cage at the zoo. I was a specimen, important to look at, certainly other people would suffer snake bites and it was a matter of professional interest to ensure they saw my rainbow skin

"Lovely as a Renoir painting," I said, though my skin was colored by poison not scintillating light.  Four nights after the bite I’d come. Just within the outer limit, they said. An hour longer and I’d have gone, they said. Four nights they waited to write my death certificate. I laughed a lot. My life was not all pain, after all, there was beauty and moments of happiness. 

 "No pain relievers," I said, determined to live those last moments to the full. I left

my body and hovered above the room, watching my brother try to use the melodrama of my impending death to try and make peace with my father. I saw pieces of love I’d felt in my life. My gardener who’d comforted me when I’d said to him, bravely, I think I’m about to die, having felt my first loose tooth.

At five, I was scared of death, as I no longer was by fifteen. He’d held my hands in his leathered palms and smiled and said, no I wasn’t going to die. Everyone’s teeth fell out and then grew back and then fell out again and that second time they wouldn’t grow back, but that was far away. Or maybe never 

If I died there in the gray hospital room, the stench of phinayl filling my nostrils. If I died there, the world would still spin the next day I thought and it filled me with such joy. Strange, yet why should it be strange? Stars had sequined the black sari of sky before my birth and would shimmer on after my death

Starlight, reaching us from so far, after, perhaps the star the light emanated from was gone. When we peer into the night sky, we see the dead looking back at us. That’s what physics shows us. Physics and the beauty of math had dazzled me as a child, with the notion of infinity and that night as I journeyed beyond words and numbers, as I voyaged, 

infinity infused 

my soul. I enter a place indescribable, a peace unending, a joy, oh what joy!

And this is what I hold, what I know to be sure, as I am jerked back to the world by the sight of tears, like starlight streaming down my beloved gardener’s night-black cheeks,

As I return to my body and my hospital bed and whatever years of life are left in me, my mother weeping tears of relief, my aunts saying “Thank God her daughter didn’t die, she’s been through so much already, her husband deserting her, leaving her penniless after all the wealth they’d shared and that huge home they’d had, leaving her with a daughter who said she would prefer to live alone with her mother than move into her grandfather’s home; an indecently strong daughter….”

As I return to doctors in disbelief writing my birth certificate

This is what I know to be true:

Wherever we go, our names matter not; 

nor do the names we use to describe that immense, infinite, indescribable power of good that so many of us call God. The ancient Hindus, the sages whose blood runs in my veins, spoke of God not as he or she but ultimately as “it.” What a terrible coincidence that L’Engle used that word to describe the ultimately evil brain!

To me, God will always be it. Not this, not this, not this, my sages sang in Sanskrit. No better description shall I ever find. Not male nor female but both, nor human nor animal nor plant, but all three, neither only alive nor inanimate, perhaps because of my Hindu upbringing, I shall always in my blood feel the surging song of the Vedanta. 

As each river follows its own path to the one great ocean, whether it runs slow or fast, straight or meandering, smooth or not, in the end, each river rushes into the arms of the all embracing sea. So do we, each of us souls, in the end, I surely believe, 
attain God – or if you prefer, the power of Good, the ultimate Good which is compassion, the ability to feel from within another’s skin. 

Because in the end, we are not bodies that have souls, we are souls in possession of these material bodies for a while, are we not? 

Whether the souls reincarnate, an idea I give credence to as  Hindu, or not, is immaterial. Ultimately, I don’t care. Those trivial details are interesting. The variety of our beliefs is interesting. I enjoy diversity. 

But I shall speak up always against those who insist on preserving and protecting and perpetuating soul racism. 

Too strong? To me, coming from a religion that spoke of acceptance (not mere tolerance) and yet also a religion that birthed a million inhuman inequities, I believe God is beyond soul racism. 

If God were to believe in untouchability, a Hindu leader once wrote, I would not recognize Him as God at all. I say, if God were to recognize religion and prefer one religion above another, I would not recognize this behavior as Godlike. 

All of us who have touched infinity, 

whether through an experience of near-death in a hospital 

or while working in a laboratory 

or while reading a book and experiencing that miracle of empathy that words may bring, when we breathe another’s breath, think their thoughts, live in their world, see as they see, hear as they hear, feel as they feel, as we inhabit another’s soul, 

or raising voice in prayer in a church or synagogue or temple or mosque or one of the million other places we humans erect to savor the power of infinite good and infinite love, 

all of us whose soul moves in those moments of life when we feel most aware and most loved, 

all of our souls, to me, must be accepted as equal. To do otherwise is to place undue importance on impermanence. To emphasize too strongly what our eyes can see, what our ears can hear, 

to emphasize names is to emphasize material things and forget the spiritual,

to entirely misunderstand the unseen. 

Wednesday, March 28, 2018

I is for Inclusion


We're celebrating Women's History month with 31 days of posts focused on improving the climate for social and gender equality in the children’s and teens’ literature community.
Join in the conversation on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/kidlitwomen or Twitter #kidlitwomen.
Thanks to Grace Lin for welcoming me to contribute on gender equity in kidlit. My contribution to the conversation: seven suggestions that I hope will help create a more inclusive and comfortable atmosphere before, during, and after author visits/events:

1. Invite diverse speakers because you believe in them, not because others have decided they're stars.

Not long ago, I was uninvited to give a keynote. Yes, you read right - uninvited.

Writing about this terrifies me, because although I'm speaking in general terms, I fear someone will get upset or angry and then I'll be made to pay for mentioning it. But others have had the courage to speak out this month, and though I'm afraid of what may happen, I've decided it's important to share this incident, especially because many people assume that thanks to the marvelous work done by We Need Diverse Books, this sort of thing no longer happens.

Sometime back, I received an email saying 'our conference theme is diversity, are you free to give a keynote address'?  Yes, I said and planned my travel. Much later, I got another email that said, 'Sorry, but the committee decided instead to invite XXX' (a straight white male who does not, I believe, have a disability). Although I'd been demoted I was asked if I might do a workshop, and I decided to attend, especially as I'd by then arranged for other events in the area. When I arrived, I discovered that, like a log afloat on foam, I was the only brown face in a sea of white. Did I say the conference theme was diversity?

I fully admit there was a misunderstanding. I assumed the first email was an invitation (because usually when someone asks if I'm free to give a keynote, it means they want me to do it). The author who did give the keynote address is someone whose work I respect, he is extremely well known, has won several of "the most important" awards etc. So I was expected to understand and accept the uninvitation with grace, which I like to think I did. But the incident left me thinking.

I've been invited to give keynotes by people who believed in my work, and didn't care about the level of success I had or hadn't achieved. I've also been told, by others, that they "wished" they could someday invite me, by which they mean, if you achieve this or that, then, (and only then), you'll be invited.

As anyone who has followed the posts published this month will acknowledge, there are several inequities in our kidlit world. And, in my opinion, there are plenty of brilliant authors who are also marvelous speakers; who, for one reason or another haven't yet - and may never - get "the" sales/fame/awards. Why not go ahead and invite, highlight, celebrate and showcase dedicated authors whose work you love,admire and respect, but who haven't necessarily received "the" level of attention? This won't give conference attendees and organizers the same level of bragging rights (no guess-whom-I-rubbed-shoulders-with-last-night post-conference blog posts). But if you love a famous author as much as an unknown, why not treat them equally well?

After all, money is often tight. But maybe instead of withholding income from "lesser" names, or, as is unfortunately too often the case asking brilliant non-male authors to contribute time pro-bono because they haven't received immense material success, conference organizers might consider inviting fewer celebrities and spreading the wealth more evenly, by shining the spotlight on some authors who've written wonderful books for years but whose names are not immediately recognized?

2. Involve us initially as well as finally.

It's one thing to invite a "diverse" speaker (or, better still, many such speakers). It's another - and equally important thing  - to involve diverse people when planning an event.

3. Introduce us the way we'd like, please?

Before a talk, teachers usually introduce me as Padma. Although, for the most part, I don't care about titles, when I'm visiting schools, I like to have students address me as 'Dr. Venkatraman' - and yes, they can pronounce my name, it's not that hard!

Why 'doctor'? Because then, they're acknowledging that a woman of color could be a scientist as well as an author. And unfortunately, even today, students generally assume that a "scientist" or a "Dr." must be a white male.  Often, we make assumptions about gender and so much else, as soon as we're introduced to someone. It might help a little if, when an author visits, you ask what they feel is important to emphasize (or de-emphasize) when you introduce them, as well as how they'd like to be addressed (titles and pronouns)?

4. Inquire (without condescension, if possible).

After a talk, ask questions. Ask plenty of questions. But do try, and encourage students to try, to word questions thoughtfully.

I love to help people understand my background, even when adults ask questions like "Is it true Hindus burn widows?" or "Why is your culture so primitive that it treats women like dirt?" I'd rather be asked questions than have someone remain silent because they're scared they'll say something inadvertently insensitive. 

But of course, I prefer questions that aren't phrased offensively. One way to avoid this, especially when preparing students to meet authors from a 'different' cultural/ethnic background, is to try and avoid other-ing them. For example, if you are studying a book that shows gender violence in another country, rather than focus merely on this 'strange' culture in which such cruelty is perpetrated, spend at least a wee bit of time reflecting on gender inequities that remain/continue in our own time and place. And, spend time researching, to show that this culture has, as indeed every culture has, led the world in some way, at some point.

It might also be worth pointing out the obvious: within every culture, at every time, there are instances of power abuse; there are also, always, everywhere, people who are inclusive and compassionate. Understanding and acceptance aren't 'modern' values, although they do wax and wane, and are more obvious or blatant, perhaps, during certain periods in certain cultures. And if your students do end up asking awkward questions - that's fine. We're here for them. Any question is better than no question.

5. Include as many as possible in conversation.

Usually, we (author colleagues) gather together in happy clutches at events. But I've also witnessed (and probably sometimes caused) exclusion. Try not to shut out anyone, either through body language or through conversation topics that they can't relate to.

Our conversations reflect our assumptions; our assumptions reflect our privileges. Once, a group of authors (of whom I was part), discussed labor and having a biological child in the presence of a mother who'd adopted a child and statements were made that suggested that biological mothers were "real mothers." I'm not saying you mustn't converse about religion or politics or your private life or your successes and failures. Just, if you see someone feeling left out, try and reach out?

6. Indulge yourself less, and have the courage to shut up sometimes so others can talk.  

Recently, author Jacqueline Davies offered to step down from a panel to create a space for a more diverse voice. I'm not advocating that one should or shouldn't do this or that based on who you feel you are - but I'd like to say that I hope I have it in me to be as generous as Davies when I'm in a position of privilege (because we are all, at one point or another, in positions of privilege).

7. Individuals come together to form groups; please respect and recognize our unique voices.

I've been mistaken for other Indian-American authors. We do all have black hair (or mostly black, I've spotted a couple of not-so-black ones sprouting on my head recently). If you're one of those who called me Jhumpa Lahiri, don't worry, I love pretending I won the Pulitzer. But I don't think we look alike.

Nor do we all, within a given group, share the same views. Not having grown up in this country, having an accent that clearly delineates me as 'alien' and being a first-generation immigrant - all this gives rise to barriers  - and so my experience differs from authors who grew up in the United States but who're also South Asian.  

Adding diversity to your conference (or bookshelf) doesn't mean just having one author from each "category" you can think of. It means listening to - and learning about - and loving - individual voices, which differ within race, within gender, within every label that can be used to group people.